From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 19716 invoked by alias); 24 Feb 2003 07:27:17 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 19709 invoked from network); 24 Feb 2003 07:27:17 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO localhost.redhat.com) (24.157.209.173) by 172.16.49.205 with SMTP; 24 Feb 2003 07:27:17 -0000 Received: from redhat.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by localhost.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9720B294F; Mon, 24 Feb 2003 02:29:29 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: <3E59C9D9.3040906@redhat.com> Date: Mon, 24 Feb 2003 07:27:00 -0000 From: Andrew Cagney User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; NetBSD macppc; en-US; rv:1.0.2) Gecko/20030223 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Michael Elizabeth Chastain Cc: drow@mvista.com, fnasser@redhat.com, gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: [rfa] new test, pr-1090.exp, multi-register variables References: <200302240435.h1O4ZVb07087@duracef.shout.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SW-Source: 2003-02/txt/msg00575.txt.bz2 Just FYI, > To my mind, these are critical bugs, because gdb quietly prints the > wrong information. If we can't fix it for 5.4/6.0 then I want to > add gdb/214 and gdb/1090 to the PROBLEMS file. The only critical thing in GDB 5.4/6.0 is ensuring that the new EMACS mode has everything it needs without relying on level two annotiations. And that has a very hard deadline :-( Andrew