From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 15810 invoked by alias); 18 Feb 2003 21:20:15 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 15803 invoked from network); 18 Feb 2003 21:20:15 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO localhost.redhat.com) (172.16.49.200) by 172.16.49.205 with SMTP; 18 Feb 2003 21:20:15 -0000 Received: from redhat.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by localhost.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 365962D37; Tue, 18 Feb 2003 16:25:03 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: <3E52A4AF.6030007@redhat.com> Date: Tue, 18 Feb 2003 21:20:00 -0000 From: Andrew Cagney User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; NetBSD i386; en-US; rv:1.0.2) Gecko/20030217 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Daniel Jacobowitz Cc: Pierre Muller , gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: [RFC] New file fpc-abi.c References: <5.0.2.1.2.20030217180426.02227540@ics.u-strasbg.fr> <5.0.2.1.2.20030217180426.02227540@ics.u-strasbg.fr> <5.0.2.1.2.20030218085343.03243438@ics.u-strasbg.fr> <20030218144525.GA6379@nevyn.them.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SW-Source: 2003-02/txt/msg00380.txt.bz2 > I do not claim that the fpc-abi.c is a completely correct code, >> but: >> 1) it avoids some internal GDB crashes when trying to debug executables >> that contain both FPC and GNU C v3 generated code. >> 2) It enhances the class recognition with respect to the gnu-v2 >> ABI. >> 3) It is only used if the object has a fpc_compiled minimal symbol, >> which should be enough to avoid any interference with other compiler, no? > > > Could you remove or stub out the implementations which are incorrect > for FPC and repost it, please? Good case for internal_error(). Last thing gdb should do is print bogus info. Andrew