From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 28533 invoked by alias); 18 Feb 2003 15:42:17 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 28526 invoked from network); 18 Feb 2003 15:42:17 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO external1.doc.com) (63.119.183.65) by 172.16.49.205 with SMTP; 18 Feb 2003 15:42:17 -0000 Received: (qmail 18348 invoked from network); 18 Feb 2003 15:42:28 -0000 Received: from cpe-24-221-209-215.co.sprintbbd.net (HELO doc.com) (24.221.209.215) by external1 with SMTP; 18 Feb 2003 15:42:28 -0000 Message-ID: <3E525456.7050203@doc.com> Date: Tue, 18 Feb 2003 15:42:00 -0000 From: Adam Fedor User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux ppc; en-US; rv:1.1) Gecko/20020905 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: GDB Patches Subject: Re: [RFA] Have ObjC shared the cplus_specific struct References: <3E51AC66.3060704@doc.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SW-Source: 2003-02/txt/msg00373.txt.bz2 Adam Fedor wrote: > This patch removes the objc_specific struct and uses the cplus_specific > one instead. > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > 2003-02-17 Adam Fedor > > * symtab.h: Remove objc_specific struct > * symtab.c (symbol_init_language_specific, > symbol_init_demangled_name, symbol_demangled_name): Have > language_objc use cplus_specific struct. > > @@ -558,7 +568,8 @@ symbol_init_demangled_name (struct gener > > demangled = symbol_find_demangled_name (gsymbol, mangled); > if (gsymbol->language == language_cplus > - || gsymbol->language == language_java) > + || gsymbol->language == language_java > + || gsymbol->language == language_objc) > { > if (demangled) > { Minor oops. This part of the patch is actually supposed to go with my other patch to demangle objc names. See PR 1066 or http://sources.redhat.com/ml/gdb-patches/2003-01/msg00442.html