Mirror of the gdb-patches mailing list
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Andrew Cagney <ac131313@redhat.com>
To: David Carlton <carlton@math.stanford.edu>
Cc: Daniel Jacobowitz <drow@mvista.com>, gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com
Subject: Re: [commit/obish] Fix cntrl-z
Date: Thu, 13 Feb 2003 17:27:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <3E4BD582.3080700@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <ro1u1f9fibc.fsf@jackfruit.Stanford.EDU>

> On Wed, 12 Feb 2003 13:42:32 -0500, Daniel Jacobowitz <drow@mvista.com> said:
> 
> 
>> Woah!  Deterministic behavior on the annotate-quit test?
> 
> 
> Yeah.  It had actually always been deterministic for me: I never saw
> it pass.  Then it started always passing after the interpreter merge.
> But when I saw the aforementioned patch go by, I thought that might
> undo the good work, and sure enough, it did.  Michael Chastain has
> also made similar observations (though he hasn't yet had time to
> verify my observation from today).  So:

Given the interps change wasn't ment to affect that annotate test, I 
don't think that it suddenly working can really be thought of as `good 
work'.  It just happens to make it work, probably because something 
is/isn't being flushed now.

>> It's probably something in the CLI command loop then...
> 
> 
> We do seem to have enough data to make this sound plausible.  Though
> I'm not familiar enough with the code in question to say anything
> more.

Andrew



  reply	other threads:[~2003-02-13 17:27 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2003-02-12 15:36 Andrew Cagney
2003-02-12 17:35 ` David Carlton
2003-02-12 18:42   ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2003-02-12 18:46     ` David Carlton
2003-02-13 17:27       ` Andrew Cagney [this message]
2003-02-12 20:04 Michael Elizabeth Chastain
2003-02-12 22:44 Michael Elizabeth Chastain
2003-02-13  1:27 Michael Elizabeth Chastain

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=3E4BD582.3080700@redhat.com \
    --to=ac131313@redhat.com \
    --cc=carlton@math.stanford.edu \
    --cc=drow@mvista.com \
    --cc=gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox