From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 15500 invoked by alias); 30 Jan 2003 03:31:30 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 15490 invoked from network); 30 Jan 2003 03:31:25 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO localhost.redhat.com) (24.157.209.173) by 172.16.49.205 with SMTP; 30 Jan 2003 03:31:25 -0000 Received: from redhat.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by localhost.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 782C74075 for ; Wed, 29 Jan 2003 22:31:22 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: <3E389C8A.7080702@redhat.com> Date: Thu, 30 Jan 2003 03:31:00 -0000 From: Andrew Cagney User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; NetBSD macppc; en-US; rv:1.0.1) Gecko/20021211 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: [rfa/i386] Make codestream deprecated? References: <3DEAAB57.4070609@redhat.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SW-Source: 2003-01/txt/msg00805.txt.bz2 > Hello, > > The attached is to make it clear that codestream isn't the way to go when trying to improve GDB's performance. I don't see any urgency in actually removing the code, though. > > The codestream has been supperseeded by a dcache. > > thoughts? > > ok to commit? > > Andrew Mark, Daniel, given the current, er, problem with annotation level-two are either of you interested in re-considering your view here :-) Andrew > 2002-12-01 Andrew Cagney > > * i386-tdep.c: Replace `codestream' with `deprecated_codestream'.