Re: [rfa/doco] FRAME_FP -> read_fp

[Andrew Cagney <ac131313@redhat.com>]

Really old thread:

Eli, I'm dropping this patch.  Instead, I'm doing the full rewrite.

Andrew

>> Date: Wed, 20 Nov 2002 11:25:43 -0500
>> From: Andrew Cagney <ac131313@redhat.com>
> 
>> > 
>> > Ahm, what does this mean, exactly, "read_fp in the machine description"?  
>> > Isn't read_fp a function?  If so, how can it be present ``in the machine 
>> > description''?
> 
>> 
>> regcache.c contains:
>> 
>> CORE_ADDR
>> read_fp (void)
>> {
>>    return TARGET_READ_FP ();
>> }
>> 
>> and TARGET_READ_FP() is part of the machine description (a.k.a. 
>> architecture vector).
> 
> 
> Yes, but still I find it confusing to tell that a function is in the
> machine description.  A machine description is a bunch of macros and
> machine-specific functions, right?  And read_fp is neither of these,
> right?
> 
> 
>> Hmm, I guess this could do with a similar s/FP_REGNUM/read_fp/ 
>> transformation?
> 
> 
> Probably.
>