From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 23128 invoked by alias); 28 Jan 2003 19:45:05 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 23121 invoked from network); 28 Jan 2003 19:45:03 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO localhost.redhat.com) (66.30.197.194) by 172.16.49.205 with SMTP; 28 Jan 2003 19:45:03 -0000 Received: from redhat.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by localhost.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 66537406C; Tue, 28 Jan 2003 14:45:01 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: <3E36DDBD.9000108@redhat.com> Date: Tue, 28 Jan 2003 19:45:00 -0000 From: Andrew Cagney User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; NetBSD macppc; en-US; rv:1.0.1) Gecko/20021211 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Marko Mlinar Cc: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: OC? References: <3DF6642E.7020700@redhat.com> <200212110807.45649.markom@opencores.org> <3E243623.9000700@redhat.com> <200301150929.15118.markom@opencores.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SW-Source: 2003-01/txt/msg00761.txt.bz2 > Hi Andrew! > > >> Turns out this has been done. >> > >> > We have also problems with registers. You were saying something that we >> > should move all the registers (we have 8k+ registers with generated >> > names) into the temporary storage (I hope all these won't get cached in >> > the host...). 8k * 8 bytes ~= 64k. Either that all lives in the text segment, or it is only allocated when all the names are asked for. >> Yes. A gui for instance will likely want access to all names at once. > > I tried to fix this issue, but there were not enough documentation nor such > targets for me to dig through. Is it possible that you (or somebody else) > change this please? I'm not sure what the problem is. Just wrap the current code in something that maintains a table of previously returned names. Andrew