From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 18094 invoked by alias); 27 Jan 2003 19:21:33 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 18068 invoked from network); 27 Jan 2003 19:21:32 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO localhost.redhat.com) (66.30.197.194) by 172.16.49.205 with SMTP; 27 Jan 2003 19:21:32 -0000 Received: from redhat.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by localhost.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D6888406A; Mon, 27 Jan 2003 14:21:29 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: <3E3586B9.9080100@redhat.com> Date: Mon, 27 Jan 2003 19:21:00 -0000 From: Andrew Cagney User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; NetBSD macppc; en-US; rv:1.0.1) Gecko/20021211 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Kevin Buettner Cc: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: [RFA] mips-tdep.c: Fix inferior function call breakage References: <1030123072642.ZM24777@localhost.localdomain> <3E3057F0.5000906@redhat.com> <1030124035453.ZM29667@localhost.localdomain> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SW-Source: 2003-01/txt/msg00735.txt.bz2 Thanks, > #3 0x080e0484 in gdbarch_init_extra_frame_info (gdbarch=0x8424428, > fromleaf=0, frame=0x83f8990) > at /ocotillo2/mips64linux-021009-branch/devo/gdb/gdbarch.c:4122 > #4 0x0809f589 in create_new_frame (addr=1099511626816, pc=268437552) > at /ocotillo2/mips64linux-021009-branch/devo/gdb/blockframe.c:273 Things went wrong here (with the below calling the above). However, ... > #5 0x080cd089 in run_stack_dummy (addr=268438080, buffer=0x8460058) > at /ocotillo2/mips64linux-021009-branch/devo/gdb/infcmd.c:1002 > #6 0x080b6c90 in hand_function_call (function=0x8464a90, nargs=0, > args=0xbffff054) > at /ocotillo2/mips64linux-021009-branch/devo/gdb/valops.c:1762 ... I've eliminated that call from "infcmd.c"! > Hmm, that's from a branch, but it happens with current sources too. If > you wish, I can generate another backtrace with current sources... Yes. Andrew