From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gdb-patches-return-21961-listarch-gdb-patches=sources.redhat.com@sources.redhat.com>
Received: (qmail 25468 invoked by alias); 20 Jan 2003 02:08:11 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gdb-patches-subscribe@sources.redhat.com>
List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/gdb-patches/>
List-Post: <mailto:gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com>
List-Help: <mailto:gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com
Received: (qmail 24623 invoked from network); 20 Jan 2003 02:08:06 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO localhost.redhat.com) (205.151.14.190)
  by 172.16.49.205 with SMTP; 20 Jan 2003 02:08:06 -0000
Received: from redhat.com (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by localhost.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D61993EFD
	for <gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com>; Sun, 19 Jan 2003 21:07:58 -0500 (EST)
Message-ID: <3E2B59FE.8090401@redhat.com>
Date: Mon, 20 Jan 2003 02:08:00 -0000
From: Andrew Cagney <ac131313@redhat.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; NetBSD macppc; en-US; rv:1.0.1) Gecko/20021211
X-Accept-Language: en-us, en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com
Subject: HP/UX 64 need CALL_DUMMY_LOCATION ON_STACK?
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-SW-Source: 2003-01/txt/msg00676.txt.bz2

Hello,

In checking various things to do with dummy frames, I noticed this 
potential foo-bar.

I recently changed the default for CALL_DUMMY_LOCATION from ON_STACK to 
AT_ENTRY.  I suspect the HP/PA 64 currently assumes ON_STACK.

Anyone able to check this theory?

Andrew