From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 13729 invoked by alias); 16 Jan 2003 15:46:04 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 13701 invoked from network); 16 Jan 2003 15:45:57 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO localhost.redhat.com) (216.138.202.10) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 16 Jan 2003 15:45:57 -0000 Received: from redhat.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by localhost.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CD92F3DF3; Thu, 16 Jan 2003 10:45:57 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: <3E26D3B5.9060304@redhat.com> Date: Thu, 16 Jan 2003 15:46:00 -0000 From: Andrew Cagney User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; NetBSD macppc; en-US; rv:1.0.1) Gecko/20021211 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Fernando Nasser Cc: Daniel Jacobowitz , gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: [patch/rfc] Remove all setup_xfail's from testsuite/gdb.mi/ References: <200301151744.h0FHi6O27664@duracef.shout.net> <20030115175143.GA32268@nevyn.them.org> <3E26C140.8050400@redhat.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SW-Source: 2003-01/txt/msg00604.txt.bz2 > That is correct. The last argument of a setup_xfail, if it does not contain '-' (Argh! Don't blame me, it was already there since immemorial times) is the PR number. It can easily be a gdb/NNN bug id. We cannot enforce the syntax, but we can enforce it as a police. > So, to address Michael's concerns, we could open a WONTFIX bug report (is there such category? This is the Bugzilla one) saying that it is a GCC or whatever bug and outside of our control and add the id to the setup_xfail. There is suspended and closed. I'm pretty sure I can add other states (e.g., cannotfix?). Andrew