Re: [patch/rfc] Remove all setup_xfail's from testsuite/gdb.mi/

Fernando Nasser
2003-01-16T14:46:39Z

Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
>>That is correct. The last argument of a setup_xfail, if it does not
>>contain '-' (Argh! Don't blame me, it was already there since immemorial
>>times) is the PR number. It can easily be a gdb/NNN bug id. We cannot
>>enforce the syntax, but we can enforce it as a police.
>
>
> [Last or first? Oh, the answer is "either" according to framework.exp.]
>

I was referring to the way it has been used in our tests. The distinction is
the absence of '-'s.

>>P.S.: Does someone know how to programatically access the Gnats database?
>
>
> Yes; the GNATS software package includes a number of remote tools,
> particularly nquery-pr. You have to find a copy of GNATS 3.x; the 4.x
> tools don't interoperate with the version on sourceware.
>

Ah, but that is a command, I was thinking of an API. Oh well, we can always run
the thing and capture the output I guess...

--
Fernando Nasser
Red Hat - Toronto E-Mail: fnasser@redhat.com
2323 Yonge Street, Suite #300
Toronto, Ontario M4P 2C9