From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 4901 invoked by alias); 16 Jan 2003 14:46:39 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 4882 invoked from network); 16 Jan 2003 14:46:34 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO touchme.toronto.redhat.com) (216.138.202.10) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 16 Jan 2003 14:46:34 -0000 Received: from redhat.com (totem.toronto.redhat.com [172.16.14.242]) by touchme.toronto.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AF839800086; Thu, 16 Jan 2003 09:46:33 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: <3E26C5C9.4060000@redhat.com> Date: Thu, 16 Jan 2003 14:46:00 -0000 From: Fernando Nasser Organization: Red Hat , Inc. - Toronto User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.1) Gecko/20020827 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Daniel Jacobowitz Cc: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: [patch/rfc] Remove all setup_xfail's from testsuite/gdb.mi/ References: <200301151744.h0FHi6O27664@duracef.shout.net> <20030115175143.GA32268@nevyn.them.org> <3E26C140.8050400@redhat.com> <20030116143053.GA22382@nevyn.them.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SW-Source: 2003-01/txt/msg00602.txt.bz2 Daniel Jacobowitz wrote: >>That is correct. The last argument of a setup_xfail, if it does not >>contain '-' (Argh! Don't blame me, it was already there since immemorial >>times) is the PR number. It can easily be a gdb/NNN bug id. We cannot >>enforce the syntax, but we can enforce it as a police. > > > [Last or first? Oh, the answer is "either" according to framework.exp.] > I was referring to the way it has been used in our tests. The distinction is the absence of '-'s. >>P.S.: Does someone know how to programatically access the Gnats database? > > > Yes; the GNATS software package includes a number of remote tools, > particularly nquery-pr. You have to find a copy of GNATS 3.x; the 4.x > tools don't interoperate with the version on sourceware. > Ah, but that is a command, I was thinking of an API. Oh well, we can always run the thing and capture the output I guess... -- Fernando Nasser Red Hat - Toronto E-Mail: fnasser@redhat.com 2323 Yonge Street, Suite #300 Toronto, Ontario M4P 2C9