From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 19119 invoked by alias); 14 Jan 2003 16:09:20 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 19103 invoked from network); 14 Jan 2003 16:09:17 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO localhost.redhat.com) (216.138.202.10) by 209.249.29.67 with SMTP; 14 Jan 2003 16:09:17 -0000 Received: from redhat.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by localhost.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B8F593DF5; Tue, 14 Jan 2003 11:09:07 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: <3E243623.9000700@redhat.com> Date: Tue, 14 Jan 2003 16:09:00 -0000 From: Andrew Cagney User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; NetBSD macppc; en-US; rv:1.0.1) Gecko/20021211 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Marko Mlinar Cc: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: OC? References: <3DF6642E.7020700@redhat.com> <200212110807.45649.markom@opencores.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SW-Source: 2003-01/txt/msg00518.txt.bz2 > On Tuesday 10 December 2002 23:01, Andrew Cagney wrote: > >> Marko, >> >> What changes to the core of gdb are still needed for your target? >> >> Andrew > > > Hi Andrew! > > thanks for coming back to me. > > As far as I can recall: > > #define HAVE_NONSTEPPABLE_WATCHPOINT > Needs to be discussed whether to add it to architecture or target vector? Turns out this has been done. > We have also problems with registers. You were saying something that we should > move all the registers (we have 8k+ registers with generated names) into the > temporary storage (I hope all these won't get cached in the host...). Yes. A gui for instance will likely want access to all names at once. > I hope I have not missed anything; we will see what is comming anyway after we > try to build the files. Andrew