From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 18973 invoked by alias); 14 Jan 2003 05:52:31 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 18962 invoked from network); 14 Jan 2003 05:52:29 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO localhost.redhat.com) (24.157.209.173) by 209.249.29.67 with SMTP; 14 Jan 2003 05:52:29 -0000 Received: from redhat.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by localhost.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E61E13DF5; Tue, 14 Jan 2003 00:52:07 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: <3E23A587.10009@redhat.com> Date: Tue, 14 Jan 2003 05:52:00 -0000 From: Andrew Cagney User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; NetBSD macppc; en-US; rv:1.0.1) Gecko/20021211 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Daniel Jacobowitz Cc: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: [RFC/testsuite] Update "info float" output for i386 References: <20030114041526.GA1885@nevyn.them.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SW-Source: 2003-01/txt/msg00513.txt.bz2 > Some time ago Mark Kettenis updated i387-tdep.c to use frame_register_read > for "info float". This changed the result of "info float" with no running > program; I think for the better, and so did he, if I recall rightly. Can > anyone think of a reason not to update the testsuite correspondingly, as > with the attached patch? That message comes from print_float_info, so while possibly mark's changes, it wouldn't be frame_register_read. Check with fernando, but i think that all targets should always output that message. Andrew