From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 11479 invoked by alias); 13 Jan 2003 19:00:15 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 11441 invoked from network); 13 Jan 2003 19:00:13 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO localhost.redhat.com) (216.138.202.10) by 209.249.29.67 with SMTP; 13 Jan 2003 19:00:13 -0000 Received: from redhat.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by localhost.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6EFC13C63; Mon, 13 Jan 2003 14:00:01 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: <3E230CB1.2030805@redhat.com> Date: Mon, 13 Jan 2003 19:00:00 -0000 From: Andrew Cagney User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; NetBSD macppc; en-US; rv:1.0.1) Gecko/20021211 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Daniel Jacobowitz Cc: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: [unwind-20030108-branch] Convert d10v to unwind mechanims References: <3E22F527.8050201@redhat.com> <20030113172423.GA8893@nevyn.them.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SW-Source: 2003-01/txt/msg00489.txt.bz2 > > I like it. I've got a tangential style question that I want to ask > now, though... if you're creating additional target-specific files, can > we consider putting them under config/ instead of in the top level? At this point, I don't even know if trying split out d10v-frame.[hc] is a good idea. Too many tdep<->frame dependencies. Think of it as an experiment. Andrew