From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <ac131313@redhat.com>
Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm
Received: (qmail 21203 invoked from network); 11 Jan 2003 18:14:58 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO localhost.redhat.com) (24.157.209.173)
  by 209.249.29.67 with SMTP; 11 Jan 2003 18:14:58 -0000
Received: from redhat.com (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by localhost.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id 3C0BE3ED8; Sat, 11 Jan 2003 13:14:47 -0500 (EST)
Message-ID: <3E205F17.3060906@redhat.com>
Date: Sat, 11 Jan 2003 18:14:00 -0000
From: Andrew Cagney <ac131313@redhat.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; NetBSD macppc; en-US; rv:1.0.1) Gecko/20021211
X-Accept-Language: en-us, en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Daniel Jacobowitz <drow@mvista.com>
Cc: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com
Subject: Re: [unwind-20030108-branch] Add sentinel-frame + misc
References: <3E1E2D1B.5020100@redhat.com> <3E1E6C23.8050407@redhat.com> <20030110213400.GA8623@nevyn.them.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-SW-Source: 2003-01/txt/msg00453.txt.bz2

> @@ -555,8 +522,14 @@
>>     If the value isn't here AND a value is needed, try the next inner
>>     most frame.  */
>>  
>> +struct frame_unwind_cache
>> +{
>> +  void *regs[1];
>> +};
>> +
> 
> 
> I know it makes some type-checking simpler, but naming all your private types
> the same thing is a real nuisance when using this lame "GDB" thing on
> the code afterwards.  Must we?

Looks like more bugs in gdb :-(

Andrew