From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 6315 invoked by alias); 7 Jan 2003 01:30:15 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 6308 invoked from network); 7 Jan 2003 01:30:14 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (66.187.233.31) by 209.249.29.67 with SMTP; 7 Jan 2003 01:30:14 -0000 Received: from int-mx2.corp.redhat.com (nat-pool-rdu-dmz.redhat.com [172.16.52.200]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id h0712RB27934 for ; Mon, 6 Jan 2003 20:02:28 -0500 Received: from potter.sfbay.redhat.com (potter.sfbay.redhat.com [172.16.27.15]) by int-mx2.corp.redhat.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id h071U0n26979; Mon, 6 Jan 2003 20:30:01 -0500 Received: from redhat.com (reddwarf.sfbay.redhat.com [172.16.24.50]) by potter.sfbay.redhat.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id h071U0n31935; Mon, 6 Jan 2003 17:30:00 -0800 Message-ID: <3E1A2D98.A23C4908@redhat.com> Date: Tue, 07 Jan 2003 01:30:00 -0000 From: Michael Snyder Organization: Red Hat, Inc. X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Andrew Cagney CC: Michael Elizabeth Chastain , ezannoni@redhat.com, drow@mvista.com, gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: [RFA/PATCH] breakpoint.c: fix until command References: <200301040037.h040bAd22467@duracef.shout.net> <3E18650D.6070603@redhat.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SW-Source: 2003-01/txt/msg00255.txt.bz2 Andrew Cagney wrote: > > I personally think the decision reached several months ago should stand > - `until foo' behaves per the documentation. Since that would actually change the traditional behavior, maybe we should bring more users into the discussion? Eg. by moving it to gdb?