Re: RFC: gdb_test_multiple

[Andrew Cagney <ac131313@redhat.com>]

> I want to think about this a little more anyway; as Michael mentioned,
> I don't think it's recursion safe.  I can't fix this syntax due to TCL
> limitations, so it might become:
> 
> gdb_test_multiple "break Foo::Bar" "breakpoint on Foo::Bar" \
>   "Breakpoint at .*\[\r\n\]$gdb_prompt $" { pass $msg } \
>   "Bang." { kfail "gdb/90211" $msg }
> 
> Which isn't so bad, after all.  I had some reason not to do it that way
> but I can't remember what it was, now.  What do you think of this
> change?

Which ever.  My concern is with `$_gdb_message'.  Knowing how to use 
that would have required a deep understanding of what the function 
gdb_test_multiple{} was doing.  The above at least makes immediate sense 
to someone with little tcl/tk knowledge (read: average gdb developer :-).

Andrew