From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gdb-patches-return-21461-listarch-gdb-patches=sources.redhat.com@sources.redhat.com>
Received: (qmail 17329 invoked by alias); 5 Jan 2003 15:32:58 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gdb-patches-subscribe@sources.redhat.com>
List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/gdb-patches/>
List-Post: <mailto:gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com>
List-Help: <mailto:gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com
Received: (qmail 17310 invoked from network); 5 Jan 2003 15:32:55 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO localhost.redhat.com) (66.30.197.194)
  by 209.249.29.67 with SMTP; 5 Jan 2003 15:32:55 -0000
Received: from redhat.com (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by localhost.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id D10993D16; Sun,  5 Jan 2003 10:32:45 -0500 (EST)
Message-ID: <3E18501D.8050601@redhat.com>
Date: Sun, 05 Jan 2003 15:32:00 -0000
From: Andrew Cagney <ac131313@redhat.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; NetBSD macppc; en-US; rv:1.0.1) Gecko/20021211
X-Accept-Language: en-us, en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Daniel Jacobowitz <drow@mvista.com>
Cc: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com,
	Michael Elizabeth Chastain <mec@shout.net>
Subject: Re: RFC: gdb_test_multiple
References: <20030104201600.GA26779@nevyn.them.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-SW-Source: 2003-01/txt/msg00176.txt.bz2

> gdb_test_multiple "break Foo::Bar" "breakpoint on Foo::Bar" {
>   -re "Breakpoint at .*\[\r\n\]$gdb_prompt $" {
>     pass "$_gdb_message"
>   }
>   -re "Explode!" {
>     fail "$_gdb_message (gdb/90210)"
>   }
>   -re "Bang." {
>     kfail "gdb/90211" "$_gdb_message"
>   }
> }

Why not just use:

set msg "breakpoint on Foo::Bar"
gdb_test_multiple "break Foo::Bar" {
... fail "$msg ...
}

I don't think the ``$_gdb_message'' is right.  It certainly isn't 
exactly intuative.

Andrew