From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 10178 invoked by alias); 28 Dec 2002 18:41:27 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 10164 invoked from network); 28 Dec 2002 18:41:26 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO sccrmhc02.attbi.com) (204.127.202.62) by 209.249.29.67 with SMTP; 28 Dec 2002 18:41:26 -0000 Received: from kegel.com (c-24-126-73-164.we.client2.attbi.com[24.126.73.164]) by sccrmhc02.attbi.com (sccrmhc02) with SMTP id <20021228184111002000f9lae>; Sat, 28 Dec 2002 18:41:11 +0000 Message-ID: <3E0DF317.7080206@kegel.com> Date: Sat, 28 Dec 2002 10:46:00 -0000 From: Dan Kegel User-Agent: Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 5.5; Windows 98) X-Accept-Language: de-de, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Alexandre Oliva CC: Daniel Jacobowitz , gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org, gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com, binutils@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: (toplevel) Fix dramatic breakage for ordinary crosses (related to program_transform_name) References: <20021228093127.GA455@doctormoo> <20021228163419.GA10686@nevyn.them.org> <20021228175919.GA17177@nevyn.them.org> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SW-Source: 2002-12/txt/msg00727.txt.bz2 Alexandre Oliva wrote: > On Dec 28, 2002, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote: > > >>It's a question of whether you can do the locking without making people >>throw up, I think. > > > I'm confident I can, but... On second thought, it occurs to me that > all locking would accomplish is let one make in a make -j pool run one > configure script while other makes block on the lock. Not good... I dunno, sounds fine to me if it lets the subsequent real build go in parallel. -- Dan Kegel Linux User #78045 http://www.kegel.com