From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 4992 invoked by alias); 16 Dec 2002 16:40:36 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 4984 invoked from network); 16 Dec 2002 16:40:33 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO localhost.redhat.com) (66.30.197.194) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 16 Dec 2002 16:40:33 -0000 Received: from redhat.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by localhost.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 203053CBB; Mon, 16 Dec 2002 11:40:32 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: <3DFE01FF.7040102@redhat.com> Date: Mon, 16 Dec 2002 08:44:00 -0000 From: Andrew Cagney User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; NetBSD macppc; en-US; rv:1.0.1) Gecko/20021211 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Daniel Jacobowitz Cc: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: PATCH: Fork event updates, part the eleventh References: <20021215201758.GA22617@nevyn.them.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SW-Source: 2002-12/txt/msg00473.txt.bz2 > The differences between the FORKED and VFORKED cases were all dead code now, > so we can bring them together. Committed. BTW, I think its reasonable to be only committing one of these a day. Yes it slows you down a little and yes, in theory, no other target can be broken by this stuff :-/ However, it also means that each change gets a chance to be tested by others. enjoy, Andrew