Eli Zaretskii wrote:
> On Sat, 14 Dec 2002, Michal Ludvig wrote:
> 
> 
>>-      error ("dwarf cfi error: unsupported target address length.");
>>+      error ("dwarf cfi error: unsupported target address length [%s]", 
>>+		      bfd_get_filename (abfd));
> 
> Wouldn't it be better to say "[in module %s]"?  I'm afraid a BFD file 
> name alone won't explain enough to the user.  After all, not everyone who 
> uses GDB knows all the module names in their program by heart.

Well, why not. Anyway if an error or warning like this happens, it's 
usually a GCC or GDB problem, not a user-level mistake. But it's more 
descriptive, I agree.

So can I commit it in this form?

Michal Ludvig
-- 
* SuSE CR, s.r.o     * mludvig@suse.cz
* (+420) 296.545.373 * http://www.suse.cz