From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gdb-patches-return-20939-listarch-gdb-patches=sources.redhat.com@sources.redhat.com>
Received: (qmail 9887 invoked by alias); 13 Dec 2002 20:34:55 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gdb-patches-subscribe@sources.redhat.com>
List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/gdb-patches/>
List-Post: <mailto:gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com>
List-Help: <mailto:gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com
Received: (qmail 9880 invoked from network); 13 Dec 2002 20:34:54 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO localhost.redhat.com) (66.30.197.194)
  by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 13 Dec 2002 20:34:54 -0000
Received: from redhat.com (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by localhost.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id 3B7E13D07; Fri, 13 Dec 2002 15:34:48 -0500 (EST)
Message-ID: <3DFA4468.8070205@redhat.com>
Date: Fri, 13 Dec 2002 12:38:00 -0000
From: Andrew Cagney <ac131313@redhat.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; NetBSD macppc; en-US; rv:1.0.1) Gecko/20021211
X-Accept-Language: en-us, en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Per Bothner <per@bothner.com>
Cc: Michael Snyder <msnyder@redhat.com>,
	gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com
Subject: Re: gdb patch to suppress empty lines, re-visited
References: <3DF6CDC2.5050105@bothner.com> <3DF7C9FF.63429C4D@redhat.com> <3DFA356F.6000405@bothner.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-SW-Source: 2002-12/txt/msg00427.txt.bz2

> A few people have expresses themselves in favor, and none
> have been opposed.  I don't know if that counts as a consensus ...

Personally, I don't like it :-)  At least not as a default.

Andrew