From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 32468 invoked by alias); 11 Dec 2002 23:38:28 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 32459 invoked from network); 11 Dec 2002 23:38:26 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO bothner.com) (216.102.199.253) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 11 Dec 2002 23:38:26 -0000 Received: from bothner.com (eureka.bothner.com [192.168.1.9]) by bothner.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id gBBNe7832599; Wed, 11 Dec 2002 15:40:08 -0800 Message-ID: <3DF7C8B8.8050909@bothner.com> Date: Wed, 11 Dec 2002 15:50:00 -0000 From: Per Bothner User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.2) Gecko/20021202 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Michael Snyder CC: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: gdb patch to suppress empty lines, re-visited References: <3DF6CDC2.5050105@bothner.com> <3DF7C9FF.63429C4D@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: <3DF7C9FF.63429C4D@redhat.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SW-Source: 2002-12/txt/msg00385.txt.bz2 Michael Snyder wrote: > For posterity, this changes the console output when you are > repeating a command a bunch of times by hitting return. Yes, that is the point. Perhaps I should have repeated that. > Per, I think the first discussion needs to be, > do we agree that we want this change? This changes > visible behavior, quite broadly. Of course. I should have made that more explicit. -- --Per Bothner per@bothner.com http://www.bothner.com/per/