From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 22231 invoked by alias); 10 Dec 2002 19:56:56 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 22215 invoked from network); 10 Dec 2002 19:56:52 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO localhost.redhat.com) (216.138.202.10) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 10 Dec 2002 19:56:52 -0000 Received: from redhat.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by localhost.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 748F33CFE; Tue, 10 Dec 2002 14:56:47 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: <3DF646FF.1020708@redhat.com> Date: Tue, 10 Dec 2002 12:01:00 -0000 From: Andrew Cagney User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; NetBSD macppc; en-US; rv:1.0.0) Gecko/20020824 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: glenn_engel@agilent.com Cc: drow@mvista.com, gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: patch to gdbserver for names instead of pid numbers References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SW-Source: 2002-12/txt/msg00336.txt.bz2 >> No... you can do this using 'gdbserver :1234 --attach `pidof -s foo`. >> Killall5/pidof is a 9K binary; I don't want to add this feature to the >> server directly when it's already available so lightweightly. > > > Excellent ! Someday I'll know every command available and then I'll die happy... Thanks. Hmm, can you create a bug report describing this (see http://sources.redhat.com/gdb/bugs/) (or better update the documentation :-)? It should be mentioned in the documentation. Andrew