From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 15806 invoked by alias); 5 Dec 2002 15:10:53 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 15773 invoked from network); 5 Dec 2002 15:10:51 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO touchme.toronto.redhat.com) (216.138.202.10) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 5 Dec 2002 15:10:51 -0000 Received: from redhat.com (totem.toronto.redhat.com [172.16.14.242]) by touchme.toronto.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6EDE980007B; Thu, 5 Dec 2002 10:10:50 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: <3DEF6C7A.5070606@redhat.com> Date: Thu, 05 Dec 2002 07:10:00 -0000 From: Fernando Nasser Organization: Red Hat , Inc. - Toronto User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.1) Gecko/20020827 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Daniel Jacobowitz Cc: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: [RFA/testsuite] Test printing complex numbers in C References: <20021005032208.GA31268@nevyn.them.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SW-Source: 2002-12/txt/msg00137.txt.bz2 Hi Daniel, Can you make the change to xfail conditionally on compiler version (see Michael note) and format? Thanks. Regards, Fernando Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:> Fernando, > > I think this test submission got lost, so here it is again. It's a test for > the printing of complex numbers in C, for those compilers which support it. > The test is GCC specific right now. > > [By the way, it fails on GCC 3.0/stabs because of a (probably) GCC bug in > debug information. Still not fixed in 3.2. It also fails in GCC > 2.95/DWARF-2 because of a bug with __attribute__((packed)). We can sort out > XFAILs later, I have some ideas on that front.] > -- Fernando Nasser Red Hat - Toronto E-Mail: fnasser@redhat.com 2323 Yonge Street, Suite #300 Toronto, Ontario M4P 2C9