Mirror of the gdb-patches mailing list
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Andrew Cagney <ac131313@redhat.com>
To: Andrew Cagney <ac131313@redhat.com>
Cc: Daniel Jacobowitz <drow@mvista.com>,
	Mark Kettenis <kettenis@chello.nl>,
	msnyder@redhat.com, gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com
Subject: Re: [Fwd: Re: [Fwd: Re: gdb/725: Crash using debug target and regcaches (in 5.3 branch?)]]
Date: Tue, 03 Dec 2002 19:22:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <3DED74FA.6090407@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <3DED2BBB.6030803@redhat.com>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 252 bytes --]

>   I'm kind of
> curious why it causes killed.exp to fail for you, since I've never once
> seen killed.exp _pass_.
> 
> Ok, I've run some more tests and yep, pass, fail, pass, fail, ...
> 
> I'll commit the patch.

The attached is what's in.

Andrew


[-- Attachment #2: diffs --]
[-- Type: text/plain, Size: 5731 bytes --]

2002-12-03  Andrew Cagney  <ac131313@redhat.com>

	* sparc-nat.c (fetch_inferior_registers)
	(store_inferior_registers): Add comment on problem of LWP vs
	threads.
	
	From 2002-11-21 Daniel Jacobowitz <drow@mvista.com>
	* lin-lwp.c (lin_lwp_fetch_registers): Remove.
	(lin_lwp_store_registers): Remove.
	(init_lin_lwp_ops): Use fetch_inferior_registers
	and store_inferior_registers directly.
	* sparc-nat.c (fetch_inferior_registers): Honor LWP ID.
	(store_inferior_registers): Likewise.
	Fix PR gdb/725.

Index: lin-lwp.c
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/src/src/gdb/lin-lwp.c,v
retrieving revision 1.35.2.1
diff -u -r1.35.2.1 lin-lwp.c
--- lin-lwp.c	26 Nov 2002 01:32:21 -0000	1.35.2.1
+++ lin-lwp.c	3 Dec 2002 22:29:11 -0000
@@ -1346,32 +1346,6 @@
   child_ops.to_mourn_inferior ();
 }
 
-static void
-lin_lwp_fetch_registers (int regno)
-{
-  struct cleanup *old_chain = save_inferior_ptid ();
-
-  if (is_lwp (inferior_ptid))
-    inferior_ptid = pid_to_ptid (GET_LWP (inferior_ptid));
-
-  fetch_inferior_registers (regno);
-
-  do_cleanups (old_chain);
-}
-
-static void
-lin_lwp_store_registers (int regno)
-{
-  struct cleanup *old_chain = save_inferior_ptid ();
-
-  if (is_lwp (inferior_ptid))
-    inferior_ptid = pid_to_ptid (GET_LWP (inferior_ptid));
-
-  store_inferior_registers (regno);
-
-  do_cleanups (old_chain);
-}
-
 static int
 lin_lwp_xfer_memory (CORE_ADDR memaddr, char *myaddr, int len, int write,
 		     struct mem_attrib *attrib,
@@ -1431,8 +1405,10 @@
   lin_lwp_ops.to_detach = lin_lwp_detach;
   lin_lwp_ops.to_resume = lin_lwp_resume;
   lin_lwp_ops.to_wait = lin_lwp_wait;
-  lin_lwp_ops.to_fetch_registers = lin_lwp_fetch_registers;
-  lin_lwp_ops.to_store_registers = lin_lwp_store_registers;
+  /* fetch_inferior_registers and store_inferior_registers will
+     honor the LWP id, so we can use them directly.  */
+  lin_lwp_ops.to_fetch_registers = fetch_inferior_registers;
+  lin_lwp_ops.to_store_registers = store_inferior_registers;
   lin_lwp_ops.to_xfer_memory = lin_lwp_xfer_memory;
   lin_lwp_ops.to_kill = lin_lwp_kill;
   lin_lwp_ops.to_create_inferior = lin_lwp_create_inferior;
Index: sparc-nat.c
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/src/src/gdb/sparc-nat.c,v
retrieving revision 1.13
diff -u -r1.13 sparc-nat.c
--- sparc-nat.c	21 Apr 2002 05:34:06 -0000	1.13
+++ sparc-nat.c	3 Dec 2002 22:29:11 -0000
@@ -1,5 +1,6 @@
 /* Functions specific to running gdb native on a SPARC running SunOS4.
-   Copyright 1989, 1992, 1993, 1994, 1996, 1997, 1998, 1999, 2000, 2001
+   Copyright 1989, 1992, 1993, 1994, 1996, 1997, 1998, 1999, 2000, 2001,
+   2002
    Free Software Foundation, Inc.
 
    This file is part of GDB.
@@ -58,6 +59,25 @@
   struct regs inferior_registers;
   struct fp_status inferior_fp_registers;
   int i;
+  int fetch_pid;
+
+  /* NOTE: cagney/2002-12-03: This code assumes that the currently
+     selected light weight processes' registers can be written
+     directly into the selected thread's register cache.  This works
+     fine when given an 1:1 LWP:thread model (such as found on
+     GNU/Linux) but will, likely, have problems when used on an N:1
+     (userland threads) or N:M (userland multiple LWP) model.  In the
+     case of the latter two, the LWP's registers do not necessarily
+     belong to the selected thread (the LWP could be in the middle of
+     executing the thread switch code).
+
+     These functions should instead be paramaterized with an explicit
+     object (struct regcache, struct thread_info?) into which the LWPs
+     registers can be written.  */
+
+  fetch_pid = TIDGET (inferior_ptid);
+  if (fetch_pid == 0)
+    fetch_pid = PIDGET (inferior_ptid);
 
   /* We should never be called with deferred stores, because a prerequisite
      for writing regs is to have fetched them all (PREPARE_TO_STORE), sigh.  */
@@ -75,7 +95,7 @@
       || regno >= Y_REGNUM
       || (!register_valid[SP_REGNUM] && regno < I7_REGNUM))
     {
-      if (0 != ptrace (PTRACE_GETREGS, PIDGET (inferior_ptid),
+      if (0 != ptrace (PTRACE_GETREGS, fetch_pid,
 		       (PTRACE_ARG3_TYPE) & inferior_registers, 0))
 	perror ("ptrace_getregs");
 
@@ -105,7 +125,7 @@
       regno == FPS_REGNUM ||
       (regno >= FP0_REGNUM && regno <= FP0_REGNUM + 31))
     {
-      if (0 != ptrace (PTRACE_GETFPREGS, PIDGET (inferior_ptid),
+      if (0 != ptrace (PTRACE_GETFPREGS, fetch_pid,
 		       (PTRACE_ARG3_TYPE) & inferior_fp_registers,
 		       0))
 	perror ("ptrace_getfpregs");
@@ -151,6 +171,13 @@
   struct regs inferior_registers;
   struct fp_status inferior_fp_registers;
   int wanna_store = INT_REGS + STACK_REGS + FP_REGS;
+  int store_pid;
+
+  /* NOTE: cagney/2002-12-02: See comment in fetch_inferior_registers
+     about threaded assumptions.  */
+  store_pid = TIDGET (inferior_ptid);
+  if (store_pid == 0)
+    store_pid = PIDGET (inferior_ptid);
 
   /* First decide which pieces of machine-state we need to modify.  
      Default for regno == -1 case is all pieces.  */
@@ -233,7 +260,7 @@
       inferior_registers.r_y =
 	*(int *) &registers[REGISTER_BYTE (Y_REGNUM)];
 
-      if (0 != ptrace (PTRACE_SETREGS, PIDGET (inferior_ptid),
+      if (0 != ptrace (PTRACE_SETREGS, store_pid,
 		       (PTRACE_ARG3_TYPE) & inferior_registers, 0))
 	perror ("ptrace_setregs");
     }
@@ -247,7 +274,7 @@
       memcpy (&inferior_fp_registers.Fpu_fsr,
 	      &registers[REGISTER_BYTE (FPS_REGNUM)], sizeof (FPU_FSR_TYPE));
       if (0 !=
-	  ptrace (PTRACE_SETFPREGS, PIDGET (inferior_ptid),
+	  ptrace (PTRACE_SETFPREGS, store_pid,
 		  (PTRACE_ARG3_TYPE) & inferior_fp_registers, 0))
 	perror ("ptrace_setfpregs");
     }

  reply	other threads:[~2002-12-04  3:22 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2002-11-26 14:10 Andrew Cagney
2002-11-27 12:55 ` Andrew Cagney
2002-11-30  8:13   ` Mark Kettenis
2002-11-30  8:42     ` Andrew Cagney
2002-12-03  9:10       ` Andrew Cagney
2002-12-03  9:19         ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2002-12-03 11:20           ` Andrew Cagney
2002-12-03 11:33             ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2002-12-03 13:41               ` Andrew Cagney
2002-12-03 13:46                 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2002-12-03 14:10                   ` Andrew Cagney
2002-12-03 19:22                     ` Andrew Cagney [this message]
2002-12-03  9:27 Michael Elizabeth Chastain

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=3DED74FA.6090407@redhat.com \
    --to=ac131313@redhat.com \
    --cc=drow@mvista.com \
    --cc=gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com \
    --cc=kettenis@chello.nl \
    --cc=msnyder@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox