From: Fernando Nasser <fnasser@redhat.com>
To: Michael Snyder <msnyder@redhat.com>
Cc: Kevin Buettner <kevinb@redhat.com>, gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com
Subject: Re: [RFA] gdb.base/shr1.c: Avoid preprocessor conflict on IRIX
Date: Tue, 03 Dec 2002 07:59:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <3DECD75E.9000304@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <3D6AD6F4.7CCADBB3@redhat.com>
The patch was withdrawn Michael. See below:
--------------------------------------------------
On Jul 29, 4:24pm, Kevin Buettner wrote:
> * gdb.base/shr1.c (sgi): Rename to sgi_ to avoid conflict with
> implicit -Dsgi on Irix systems.
I'm withdrawing this patch. David Anderson has convinced me that
using -Usgi is safe enough for the gdb testsuite. I'll post a new
patch to shlib-call.exp.
My thanks to David Anderson for his comments on my patch.
Kevin
-----------------------------------------------------
Michael Snyder wrote:
> Kevin Buettner wrote:
>
>>Another Irix change. I don't really like this change; I played around
>>with compiler options in an attempt to avoid changing the source code,
>>but the only one that I came up with which might work is -Usgi. But
>>that's dangerous because there may be a system header which depends upon
>>``sgi''.
>>
>>So, I relunctantly submit the following patch for approval...
>>
>> * gdb.base/shr1.c (sgi): Rename to sgi_ to avoid conflict with
>> implicit -Dsgi on Irix systems.
>
>
> Kevin, did anyone reply?
> I think this change is OK -- sgi was wrong to clobber this legal
> identifier.
>
>
>
>>Index: testsuite/gdb.base/shr1.c
>>===================================================================
>>RCS file: /cvs/src/src/gdb/testsuite/gdb.base/shr1.c,v
>>retrieving revision 1.1.1.2
>>diff -u -p -r1.1.1.2 shr1.c
>>--- testsuite/gdb.base/shr1.c 28 Jun 1999 16:04:00 -0000 1.1.1.2
>>+++ testsuite/gdb.base/shr1.c 29 Jul 2002 22:28:00 -0000
>>@@ -4,7 +4,7 @@
>> typedef float f;
>>
>> float sg = 5.5;
>>-int sgi = 2;
>>+int sgi_ = 2;
>> static int sgs = 7;
>>
>> #ifdef PROTOTYPES
>>@@ -23,7 +23,7 @@ int x;
>> }
>> mumble = 7.7;
>> sg = 6.6;
>>- sgi++;
>>+ sgi_++;
>> sgs = 8;
>> printf("address of sgs is 0x%x\n", &sgs);
>> return 2*x;
>
--
Fernando Nasser
Red Hat Canada Ltd. E-Mail: fnasser@redhat.com
2323 Yonge Street, Suite #300
Toronto, Ontario M4P 2C9
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2002-12-03 15:59 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2002-07-29 16:36 Kevin Buettner
2002-07-30 8:32 ` Andrew Cagney
2002-07-30 11:27 ` Kevin Buettner
2002-08-26 18:39 ` Michael Snyder
2002-12-03 7:59 ` Fernando Nasser [this message]
2002-07-29 23:52 David Anderson
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=3DECD75E.9000304@redhat.com \
--to=fnasser@redhat.com \
--cc=gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com \
--cc=kevinb@redhat.com \
--cc=msnyder@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox