From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gdb-patches-return-20463-listarch-gdb-patches=sources.redhat.com@sources.redhat.com>
Received: (qmail 28523 invoked by alias); 28 Nov 2002 17:00:42 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gdb-patches-subscribe@sources.redhat.com>
List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/gdb-patches/>
List-Post: <mailto:gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com>
List-Help: <mailto:gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com
Received: (qmail 28509 invoked from network); 28 Nov 2002 17:00:39 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO localhost.redhat.com) (216.138.202.10)
  by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 28 Nov 2002 17:00:39 -0000
Received: from redhat.com (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by localhost.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id 82E013F30; Thu, 28 Nov 2002 12:00:34 -0500 (EST)
Message-ID: <3DE64BB2.9000700@redhat.com>
Date: Thu, 28 Nov 2002 09:00:00 -0000
From: Andrew Cagney <ac131313@redhat.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; NetBSD macppc; en-US; rv:1.0.0) Gecko/20020824
X-Accept-Language: en-us, en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Richard.Earnshaw@arm.com, Kris Warkentin <kewarken@qnx.com>
Cc: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com
Subject: Re: [rfa?] Add frame_align(); Was: ARM stack alignment on hand  called
 functions
References: <200211281649.gASGngu29883@pc960.cambridge.arm.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-SW-Source: 2002-11/txt/msg00719.txt.bz2

>> >> >> +/* Ensure that the ARM's stack pointer has the correct alignment for a
>> >> >> +   new frame.  */
>> >> >> +static CORE_ADDR
>> >> >> +arm_frame_align (struct gdbarch *gdbarch, CORE_ADDR addr)
>> >> >> +{
>> >> >> +  return (addr & -16);
>> >> >> +}

>> You mean ~(ULONGEST)0x7?

> I mean ~(typeof(addr)) 0x7.

M'kay (finally gets brain around what that expression is doing), back to 
the patch.

Does it fix the bug?

Andrew