From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 31022 invoked by alias); 26 Nov 2002 15:11:09 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 31006 invoked from network); 26 Nov 2002 15:11:07 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO localhost.redhat.com) (216.138.202.10) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 26 Nov 2002 15:11:07 -0000 Received: from redhat.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by localhost.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id F1BBC3F30; Tue, 26 Nov 2002 10:11:01 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: <3DE38F05.6090803@redhat.com> Date: Tue, 26 Nov 2002 07:11:00 -0000 From: Andrew Cagney User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; NetBSD macppc; en-US; rv:1.0.0) Gecko/20020824 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 Cc: Richard Earnshaw , gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: revamped gdb_mbuild.sh References: <200211260952.gAQ9qUT22115@pc960.cambridge.arm.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SW-Source: 2002-11/txt/msg00645.txt.bz2 > Richard, >> >> Finally got to trying the gdb_mbuild.sh script and, in the process, >> integrated some, er, `new features' from my old local script: >> > > > Looks pretty good to me. My only comment is that we loose the ability to > run gnumake with -j replacing it with simultaneous configures/builds > of different targets. That means a higher transient disk usage (storage) > which would be a marginal problem for me due to lack of disk quota on the > multi-way machines... ;-( But that's me thinking about my environment, so > it isn't a major objection I was wondering about a schema where one resource was allocated to configure while the remaining N-1 were allocated to a single build. That would mean an even faster turnaround on the first build (which I've found is what I'm after :-). I guess we just wonder ... Andrew