From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 25800 invoked by alias); 21 Nov 2002 05:46:04 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 25774 invoked from network); 21 Nov 2002 05:45:58 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO localhost.redhat.com) (24.112.240.27) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 21 Nov 2002 05:45:58 -0000 Received: from redhat.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by localhost.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 205903E4B; Thu, 21 Nov 2002 00:45:44 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: <3DDC7307.5060706@redhat.com> Date: Wed, 20 Nov 2002 21:46:00 -0000 From: Andrew Cagney User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; NetBSD macppc; en-US; rv:1.0.0) Gecko/20020824 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Jim Blandy Cc: Gerhard Tonn , gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: [Patch] Fix ABI incompatibilities on s390x References: <02111910000800.24524@fmtc804> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SW-Source: 2002-11/txt/msg00513.txt.bz2 > (I understand > that IBM has a special agreement regarding how copyright assignment is > handled; perhaps the patches could be reviewed separately, but then > assigned as a single patch.) Yes, that is correct, the patch-set will need a digital assignment. Gerhard, if you need details let me know. Transfering as a single final patch at the end is a good idea. (don't forget the 5.3 branch once this has been cleared.) Andrew