From: Andrew Cagney <ac131313@redhat.com>
To: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com
Subject: Re: [patch/rfc] Overhaul regcache for {save,restore}_reggroup
Date: Wed, 13 Nov 2002 08:09:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <3DD27927.70807@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <3DCACF5A.6010801@redhat.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2353 bytes --]
> Hello,
>
> This patch brings in the last big change sitting on the reggroups branch.
>
> It adds regcache save/restore functions to to the regcache.
> These functions save/restore a subset of registers determined by the save/restore reggroups (by default REGNUMs in the range [0 .. NUM_REGS) are in both the save_reggroup and restore_reggroup, and hence are saved/restored).
>
> As part of this, a saved read-only regcache is expanded so that it can hold the saved value of any register in the full [0 .. NUM_REGS+NUM_PSEUDO_REGS) range. This is so that architectures with memory-mapped registers (which fall into the range [NUM_REGS .. NUM_REGS+NUM_PSEUDO_REGS) have somewhere to save them.
>
> I'll look to commit it in a few days,
>
> (Oh, and it deletes the last remaining core reference to read_register_bytes() or write_register_bytes()).
No comment :-) I found while re-re-merging this that it was a little to
chumpy for my liking so I've broken it down further. So far I've
committed the attached. It contains strictly mechanical changes.
Andrew
> 2002-11-07 Andrew Cagney <ac131313@redhat.com>
>
> * regcache.h (regcache_save, regcache_restore): Declare.
>
> * regcache.c (struct regcache_descr): Add fields
> sizeof_cooked_registers and sizeof_cooked_register_valid_p.
> (init_legacy_regcache_descr): Compute sizeof_cooked_registers.
> Update comments.
> (init_regcache_descr): Compute sizeof_cooked_register_valid_p and
> sizeof_cooked_registers. Update comments.
> (struct regcache): Replace passthrough_p with readonly_p. Replace
> raw_registers and raw_register_valid_p with registers and
> register_valid_p.
> (regcache_cooked_read): Check for cached cooked values.
> (regcache_xmalloc): Update.
> (regcache_save): New function.
> (regcache_restore): New function.
> (regcache_cpy): Rewrite using regcache_save, regcache_restore and
> regcache_cpy_no_passthrough.
> (regcache_raw_read): Update.
> (regcache_raw_write): Update.
> (build_regcache): Update.
> (regcache_xfree): Update.
> (regcache_cpy_no_passthrough): Update.
> (regcache_valid_p): Update.
> (deprecated_grub_regcache_for_registers): Update.
> (deprecated_grub_regcache_for_register_valid): Update.
> (register_buffer): Move declaration to start. Update.
> (regcache_raw_read): Update.
> (regcache_raw_write): Update.
>
[-- Attachment #2: diffs --]
[-- Type: text/plain, Size: 5827 bytes --]
2002-11-13 Andrew Cagney <cagney@redhat.com>
* regcache.c (register_buffer): Move to near start of file, update
description.
(regcache_raw_read): Use.
(regcache_raw_write): Use.
(struct regcache): Rename raw_registers to registers and
raw_register_valid_p to register_valid_p.
(regcache_xmalloc): Update.
(regcache_xfree): Update.
(register_buffer): Update.
(regcache_cpy): Update.
(regcache_cpy_no_passthrough): Update.
(regcache_valid_p): Update.
(deprecated_grub_regcache_for_registers): Update.
(deprecated_grub_regcache_for_register_valid): Update.
(set_register_cached): Update.
(regcache_raw_write): Update.
Index: regcache.c
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/src/src/gdb/regcache.c,v
retrieving revision 1.63
diff -u -r1.63 regcache.c
--- regcache.c 7 Nov 2002 21:43:23 -0000 1.63
+++ regcache.c 13 Nov 2002 15:53:32 -0000
@@ -277,8 +277,11 @@
struct regcache
{
struct regcache_descr *descr;
- char *raw_registers;
- char *raw_register_valid_p;
+ /* The register buffers. A read-only register cache can hold the
+ full [0 .. NUM_REGS + NUM_PSEUDO_REGS) while a read/write
+ register cache can only hold [0 .. NUM_REGS). */
+ char *registers;
+ char *register_valid_p;
/* If a value isn't in the cache should the corresponding target be
queried for a value. */
int passthrough_p;
@@ -293,9 +296,9 @@
descr = regcache_descr (gdbarch);
regcache = XMALLOC (struct regcache);
regcache->descr = descr;
- regcache->raw_registers
+ regcache->registers
= XCALLOC (descr->sizeof_raw_registers, char);
- regcache->raw_register_valid_p
+ regcache->register_valid_p
= XCALLOC (descr->sizeof_raw_register_valid_p, char);
regcache->passthrough_p = 0;
return regcache;
@@ -306,8 +309,8 @@
{
if (regcache == NULL)
return;
- xfree (regcache->raw_registers);
- xfree (regcache->raw_register_valid_p);
+ xfree (regcache->registers);
+ xfree (regcache->register_valid_p);
xfree (regcache);
}
@@ -323,6 +326,14 @@
return make_cleanup (do_regcache_xfree, regcache);
}
+/* Return a pointer to register REGNUM's buffer cache. */
+
+static char *
+register_buffer (struct regcache *regcache, int regnum)
+{
+ return regcache->registers + regcache->descr->register_offset[regnum];
+}
+
void
regcache_cpy (struct regcache *dst, struct regcache *src)
{
@@ -338,7 +349,7 @@
{
/* ULGH!!!! Old way. Use REGISTER bytes and let code below
untangle fetch. */
- read_register_bytes (0, dst->raw_registers, REGISTER_BYTES);
+ read_register_bytes (0, dst->registers, REGISTER_BYTES);
return;
}
/* FIXME: cagney/2002-05-17: To say this bit is bad is being polite.
@@ -348,7 +359,7 @@
{
/* ULGH!!!! Old way. Use REGISTER bytes and let code below
untangle fetch. */
- write_register_bytes (0, src->raw_registers, REGISTER_BYTES);
+ write_register_bytes (0, src->registers, REGISTER_BYTES);
return;
}
buf = alloca (src->descr->max_register_size);
@@ -370,9 +381,8 @@
move of data into the current_regcache(). Doing this would be
silly - it would mean that valid_p would be completly invalid. */
gdb_assert (dst != current_regcache);
- memcpy (dst->raw_registers, src->raw_registers,
- dst->descr->sizeof_raw_registers);
- memcpy (dst->raw_register_valid_p, src->raw_register_valid_p,
+ memcpy (dst->registers, src->registers, dst->descr->sizeof_raw_registers);
+ memcpy (dst->register_valid_p, src->register_valid_p,
dst->descr->sizeof_raw_register_valid_p);
}
@@ -401,19 +411,19 @@
{
gdb_assert (regcache != NULL);
gdb_assert (regnum >= 0 && regnum < regcache->descr->nr_raw_registers);
- return regcache->raw_register_valid_p[regnum];
+ return regcache->register_valid_p[regnum];
}
char *
deprecated_grub_regcache_for_registers (struct regcache *regcache)
{
- return regcache->raw_registers;
+ return regcache->registers;
}
char *
deprecated_grub_regcache_for_register_valid (struct regcache *regcache)
{
- return regcache->raw_register_valid_p;
+ return regcache->register_valid_p;
}
/* Global structure containing the current regcache. */
@@ -471,16 +481,7 @@
{
gdb_assert (regnum >= 0);
gdb_assert (regnum < current_regcache->descr->nr_raw_registers);
- current_regcache->raw_register_valid_p[regnum] = state;
-}
-
-/* If REGNUM >= 0, return a pointer to register REGNUM's cache buffer area,
- else return a pointer to the start of the cache buffer. */
-
-static char *
-register_buffer (struct regcache *regcache, int regnum)
-{
- return regcache->raw_registers + regcache->descr->register_offset[regnum];
+ current_regcache->register_valid_p[regnum] = state;
}
/* Return whether register REGNUM is a real register. */
@@ -686,8 +687,7 @@
target_fetch_registers (regnum);
}
/* Copy the value directly into the register cache. */
- memcpy (buf, (regcache->raw_registers
- + regcache->descr->register_offset[regnum]),
+ memcpy (buf, register_buffer (regcache, regnum),
regcache->descr->sizeof_register[regnum]);
}
@@ -856,10 +856,9 @@
value in cache. */
if (!regcache->passthrough_p)
{
- memcpy ((regcache->raw_registers
- + regcache->descr->register_offset[regnum]), buf,
+ memcpy (register_buffer (regcache, regnum), buf,
regcache->descr->sizeof_register[regnum]);
- regcache->raw_register_valid_p[regnum] = 1;
+ regcache->register_valid_p[regnum] = 1;
return;
}
@@ -881,7 +880,7 @@
target_prepare_to_store ();
memcpy (register_buffer (regcache, regnum), buf,
regcache->descr->sizeof_register[regnum]);
- regcache->raw_register_valid_p[regnum] = 1;
+ regcache->register_valid_p[regnum] = 1;
target_store_registers (regnum);
}
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2002-11-13 16:09 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2002-11-07 12:38 Andrew Cagney
2002-11-13 8:09 ` Andrew Cagney [this message]
2002-11-13 9:00 ` Andrew Cagney
2002-11-13 10:01 ` Andrew Cagney
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=3DD27927.70807@redhat.com \
--to=ac131313@redhat.com \
--cc=gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox