From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 7370 invoked by alias); 8 Nov 2002 20:43:52 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 7361 invoked from network); 8 Nov 2002 20:43:49 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO localhost.redhat.com) (216.138.202.10) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 8 Nov 2002 20:43:49 -0000 Received: from redhat.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by localhost.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 293163FE4; Fri, 8 Nov 2002 15:43:52 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: <3DCC2207.9080708@redhat.com> Date: Fri, 08 Nov 2002 12:43:00 -0000 From: Andrew Cagney User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; NetBSD macppc; en-US; rv:1.0.0) Gecko/20020824 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Daniel Jacobowitz Cc: Mark Kettenis , gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: [patch rfc rfa:i386] Add i386 specific register groups References: <3DCBFA0C.70409@redhat.com> <86wunn6cea.fsf@elgar.kettenis.dyndns.org> <3DCC1F54.1000108@redhat.com> <20021108203554.GA26388@nevyn.them.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SW-Source: 2002-11/txt/msg00248.txt.bz2 > This ok? > >> > >> > >> >Hmm, why are all registers in group "general"? > >> >> Preserving existing behavior? :-^ >> > >> > I'd expect the group >> >general to only include the general-purpose registers. > >> >> So you'd like the mmx and sse registers excluded >> (general corresponds to `info all-registers')? >> >> Just give the word, > > > Wait - does general correspond to `all-registers' or `registers'? Oops, yes, other way: general == info registers all == info all-registers Andrew