From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gdb-patches-return-19882-listarch-gdb-patches=sourceware.cygnus.com@sources.redhat.com>
Received: (qmail 1627 invoked by alias); 6 Nov 2002 22:41:20 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gdb-patches-subscribe@sources.redhat.com>
List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/gdb-patches/>
List-Post: <mailto:gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com>
List-Help: <mailto:gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com
Received: (qmail 1619 invoked from network); 6 Nov 2002 22:41:19 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (66.187.233.31)
  by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 6 Nov 2002 22:41:19 -0000
Received: from int-mx2.corp.redhat.com (nat-pool-rdu-dmz.redhat.com [172.16.52.200])
	by mx1.redhat.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id gA6MIfw26971
	for <gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com>; Wed, 6 Nov 2002 17:18:41 -0500
Received: from potter.sfbay.redhat.com (potter.sfbay.redhat.com [172.16.27.15])
	by int-mx2.corp.redhat.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id gA6MfCl29156;
	Wed, 6 Nov 2002 17:41:12 -0500
Received: from redhat.com (reddwarf.sfbay.redhat.com [172.16.24.50])
	by potter.sfbay.redhat.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id gA6MfBD05966;
	Wed, 6 Nov 2002 14:41:11 -0800
Message-ID: <3DC99A87.3ED80F5C@redhat.com>
Date: Wed, 06 Nov 2002 14:41:00 -0000
From: Michael Snyder <msnyder@redhat.com>
Organization: Red Hat, Inc.
X-Accept-Language: en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: "Theodore A. Roth" <troth@openavr.org>
CC: Johannes Stezenbach <js@convergence.de>, gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com
Subject: Re: [RFA] (second rev) broken build using bison-1.75
References: <Pine.LNX.4.44.0211061424090.12303-200000@knuth.amplepower.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-SW-Source: 2002-11/txt/msg00138.txt.bz2

"Theodore A. Roth" wrote:
> 
> On Wed, 6 Nov 2002, Johannes Stezenbach wrote:
> 
> :) Theodore A. Roth wrote:
> :) >
> :) > That looks much nicer and simpler than my fix. Do you have a reference to
> :) > what the binutils people are doing so I can try to grok the fix?
> :)
> :) Yes:
> :) http://sources.redhat.com/ml/binutils/2002-10/msg00230.html
> 
> Thanks. It's probably safe to assume Alan knows what he's doing.
> (I hope ;-) I'm still not enlightened as to why it's the correct fix
> though. Haven't paid my dues to the yacc gods yet.
> 
> Attached is a revised patch with Johannes suggested fix for the type clash
> error.
> 
> Is this ok to commit now?

Yeah, I like this better.  Please check it in.