From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 8213 invoked by alias); 6 Nov 2002 20:23:08 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 8194 invoked from network); 6 Nov 2002 20:23:07 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (66.187.233.31) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 6 Nov 2002 20:23:07 -0000 Received: from int-mx2.corp.redhat.com (nat-pool-rdu-dmz.redhat.com [172.16.52.200]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id gA6K0Tw15573 for ; Wed, 6 Nov 2002 15:00:30 -0500 Received: from potter.sfbay.redhat.com (potter.sfbay.redhat.com [172.16.27.15]) by int-mx2.corp.redhat.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id gA6KN3l22318; Wed, 6 Nov 2002 15:23:04 -0500 Received: from redhat.com (reddwarf.sfbay.redhat.com [172.16.24.50]) by potter.sfbay.redhat.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id gA6KN2D28142; Wed, 6 Nov 2002 12:23:02 -0800 Message-ID: <3DC97A26.8632AB1A@redhat.com> Date: Wed, 06 Nov 2002 12:23:00 -0000 From: Michael Snyder Organization: Red Hat, Inc. X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "Theodore A. Roth" CC: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: [RFC] broken build using bison-1.75 References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SW-Source: 2002-11/txt/msg00116.txt.bz2 "Theodore A. Roth" wrote: > > Hi, > > Looks like debian testing is using bison-1.75 now (was using 1.35 > previously) which has some minor problems parsing some of the yacc files. > > The attached patch got gdb to compile for me using bison 1.75 and 1.35 on > a debian system. The missing semicolons seem obvious fixes to me, but the > new setup rule I added I'm not sure about since I can't test this myself > and don't have a good understanding of yacc grammar. > > For what it's worth, here's my configure options: > > --target=avr --enable-build-warnings=-Werror > > Ted Roth Yeah, bison has fallen into dis-use in favor of byacc. I'll give you approval to check in all the missing semicolons. As for the new setup rule, have you tested it using byacc?