From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 3532 invoked by alias); 31 Oct 2002 19:52:29 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 3482 invoked from network); 31 Oct 2002 19:52:28 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO localhost.redhat.com) (216.138.202.10) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 31 Oct 2002 19:52:28 -0000 Received: from redhat.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by localhost.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 091753C9D; Thu, 31 Oct 2002 14:52:26 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: <3DC189F9.7060904@redhat.com> Date: Thu, 31 Oct 2002 11:52:00 -0000 From: Andrew Cagney User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; NetBSD macppc; en-US; rv:1.0.0) Gecko/20020824 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Daniel Jacobowitz Cc: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: PATCH: Fix mips-linux native References: <20021030041353.GA32309@nevyn.them.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SW-Source: 2002-10/txt/msg00605.txt.bz2 > Scratch one off my TODO list. Should this be taken care of at a higher > level? And if read_register_bytes is at the appropriate level to handle it, > then there's a similar check missing in write_register_bytes. > read_register_bytes won't read from a register with no REGISTER_NAME, but > write_register_bytes will happily write them anyway. > > Committed to get my port moving again. The underlying problem is going to be taken care of at a higher level. The regcache save/restore will only save/restore registers in the save/restore register group. Andrew