From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 17832 invoked by alias); 24 Oct 2002 18:53:46 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 17815 invoked from network); 24 Oct 2002 18:53:43 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO localhost.redhat.com) (216.138.202.10) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 24 Oct 2002 18:53:43 -0000 Received: from redhat.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by localhost.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1C3B83D4A; Thu, 24 Oct 2002 14:53:42 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <3DB841B5.8090409@redhat.com> Date: Thu, 24 Oct 2002 11:53:00 -0000 From: Andrew Cagney User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; NetBSD macppc; en-US; rv:1.0.0) Gecko/20020824 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Eli Zaretskii Cc: David Carlton , gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: Patch for gdb/mi 792 References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SW-Source: 2002-10/txt/msg00509.txt.bz2 > On Tue, 22 Oct 2002, Andrew Cagney wrote: > > >> s,gdb/testsuite/gdb.c++,gdb/testsuite/gdb.cxx, >> ... >> s,gdb/testsuite/gdb.c++/m-static.cc,gdb/testsuite/gdb.cxx/m-static.cc, >> s,gdb/testsuite/gdb.c++/m-static1.cc,gdb/testsuite/gdb.cxx/m-stat1.cc, >> s,gdb/testsuite/gdb.c++/m-static.exp,gdb/testsuite/gdb.cxx/m-static.exp, >> s,gdb/testsuite/gdb.c++/m-static.h,gdb/testsuite/gdb.cxx/m-static.h, >> >> but the actual renames never match since the first s/// resulted in: >> >> gdb/testsuite/gdb.cxx/m-static.cc >> gdb/testsuite/gdb.cxx/m-static.exp >> gdb/testsuite/gdb.cxx/m-static.h >> gdb/testsuite/gdb.cxx/m-static1.cc >> >> being passed to doschk (see src/contrib). >> >> I'm not sure how well this compares to the behavior of the actual DJGPP >> command. > > > The program used to rename the files on the fly (called DJTAR) needs that > both the directory and each one of the files in that directory be > mentioned on the rename list. Ok, I think I've fixed it (David was right about the ari script bug). I'm now wondering if the check is missing anything else. Eli, are there any characters that shouldn't appear in the renamed file list. ``+'' for instance. Andrew