From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 5210 invoked by alias); 23 Oct 2002 23:58:25 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 5193 invoked from network); 23 Oct 2002 23:58:23 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO touchme.toronto.redhat.com) (216.138.202.10) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 23 Oct 2002 23:58:23 -0000 Received: from redhat.com (toocool.toronto.redhat.com [172.16.14.72]) by touchme.toronto.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0CD3D80007A; Wed, 23 Oct 2002 19:58:23 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <3DB7379E.A11BC7CF@redhat.com> Date: Wed, 23 Oct 2002 16:58:00 -0000 From: "J. Johnston" Organization: Red Hat Inc. X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Andrew Cagney Cc: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: Patch for gdb/mi problem 702 References: <3DB7209F.B1AC2251@redhat.com> <3DB724FF.7040906@redhat.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SW-Source: 2002-10/txt/msg00498.txt.bz2 Andrew Cagney wrote: > > > I have added test scenarios to gdb.mi testsuite to verify the new assign/update > > behavior. > > > > gdb/testsuite/gdb.mi/ChangeLog > > > > 2002-10-23 Jeff Johnston > > > > * mi-var-cmd.exp: Add tests to verify that a -var-assign that changes > > a value shows up in the changelist of a -var-update. > > * mi1-var-cmd.exp: Ditto. > > > > Andrew, are you satisfied with my answer to your previous question > > Yep. > > > and may I commit > > the original patch plus these changes? > > Yep, but. Can you just quickly check that, within each MI file, the new > test messages are unique. > Confirmed. > Please also add something to the NEWS file. > Done. Also added the other fixes I have added recently. Patches committed. -- Jeff J.