From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 24014 invoked by alias); 1 Oct 2002 01:07:45 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 24001 invoked from network); 1 Oct 2002 01:07:44 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO touchme.toronto.redhat.com) (216.138.202.10) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 1 Oct 2002 01:07:44 -0000 Received: from localhost.redhat.com (to-dhcp51.toronto.redhat.com [172.16.14.151]) by touchme.toronto.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 26B578001B5; Mon, 30 Sep 2002 21:07:43 -0400 (EDT) Received: from redhat.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by localhost.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2E5763DD5; Mon, 30 Sep 2002 21:07:44 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <3D98F55F.5040302@redhat.com> Date: Mon, 30 Sep 2002 18:07:00 -0000 From: Andrew Cagney User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; NetBSD macppc; en-US; rv:1.0.0) Gecko/20020824 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Elena Zannoni Cc: jjohnstn@redhat.com, Keith Seitz , gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: Patch for gdb/mi problem 672 References: <3D94DB49.BF3C3520@redhat.com> <15768.48370.999618.771334@localhost.redhat.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SW-Source: 2002-09/txt/msg00791.txt.bz2 > For the testsuite: mi0 is no more. These modified tests should go in > as mi2-var-child.exp, etc, leaving the mi-var... unchanged. Is this > the intent? Andrew? Other way round. mi-var-child.exp gets the updates (it uses -i=mi) but mi1-var-child.exp is frozen. It will mean changing: > - ui_out_tuple_begin (uiout, "changelist"); > + ui_out_list_begin (uiout, "changelist"); to: if(mi_version (uiout) <= 1) ui_out_tuple_begin (uiout, "changelist"); else ui_out_list_begin (uiout, "changelist"); (ulgh!) (or similar). (perhaphs mi_version_p (uiout, 1) would have been a better interface. Too late :-) The output is broken but its been broken since GDB 5.0 so I think this is a mi1->mi2 syntax change. Andrew