From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gdb-patches-return-19021-listarch-gdb-patches=sourceware.cygnus.com@sources.redhat.com>
Received: (qmail 1395 invoked by alias); 27 Sep 2002 23:42:22 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gdb-patches-subscribe@sources.redhat.com>
List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/gdb-patches/>
List-Post: <mailto:gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com>
List-Help: <mailto:gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com
Received: (qmail 1388 invoked from network); 27 Sep 2002 23:42:20 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO localhost.redhat.com) (216.138.202.10)
  by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 27 Sep 2002 23:42:20 -0000
Received: from redhat.com (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by localhost.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id 332A33E77; Fri, 27 Sep 2002 19:42:20 -0400 (EDT)
Message-ID: <3D94ECDB.3080908@redhat.com>
Date: Fri, 27 Sep 2002 16:42:00 -0000
From: Andrew Cagney <ac131313@redhat.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; NetBSD macppc; en-US; rv:1.0.0) Gecko/20020824
X-Accept-Language: en-us, en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: David Carlton <carlton@math.stanford.edu>
Cc: Daniel Jacobowitz <drow@mvista.com>,
	gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com, mec@shout.net
Subject: Re: [rfa/c++testsuite] (was Re: patch for PR gdb/574)
References: <15676.21042.125481.349851@jackfruit.Stanford.EDU>	<20020816032649.GA30528@nevyn.them.org>	<ro13ctewgca.fsf_-_@jackfruit.Stanford.EDU>	<ro1d6sarfad.fsf@jackfruit.Stanford.EDU> <3D94E7AE.4090403@redhat.com> <ro14rcbko0u.fsf@jackfruit.Stanford.EDU>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-SW-Source: 2002-09/txt/msg00695.txt.bz2

> On Fri, 27 Sep 2002 19:20:14 -0400, Andrew Cagney <ac131313@redhat.com> said:
> 
> 
>>> 2002-08-22  David Carlton  <carlton@math.stanford.edu>
>>> * gdb.c++/pr-574.exp: New file.
> 
> 
>>> * gdb.c++/pr-574.cc: New file.
>>> 
> 
> 
>> Suggest a rename to c++/gdb574.*.  MI's using that and got in just a
>> tiny bit earlier :-)
> 
> 
> Grump, grump, grump.  Being a lazy person, I will give the following
> justification for my naming scheme: you're proposing to change the PR
> naming category so that that PR would turn into c++574.  (Or do
> existing closed PR's not get moved?)  So it would make more sense to
> call it gdb.c++/c++574.cc, which sounds silly: the whole directory is
> about C++!  And gdb.c++/gdb574.cc is only a little less silly, or
> arguably even sillier: every single file in that directory, in its
> parent, and in the parent of its parent is about GDB, so putting 'gdb'
> in the name of a file is just plain old redundant.  Whereas putting
> 'pr' in the name of a file isn't redundant at all.

Arh, the `gdb' is to disguinguish it from gcc, not from other sub 
categories :-)

Andrew