Re: [rfc/rfa:doco] Use @sc{gdb}?

[Andrew Cagney <ac131313@redhat.com>]

>> Date: Thu, 26 Sep 2002 13:40:37 -0400
>> From: Andrew Cagney <ac131313@redhat.com>
>> 
> 
>> >> Date: Fri, 23 Aug 2002 18:33:51 -0400
>> >> From: Andrew Cagney <ac131313@ges.redhat.com>
>> >> 
>> >> I got annoyed at all the GDB's in the formatted manual being really 
>> >> large so tried changing them to @sc{gdb}.  It fixed that problem but I'm 
>> >> not sure that I like the final result :-)  (You'll need to build 
>> >> gdb.pdf, gdb ps or gdb.dvi).
>> >> 
>> >> Is there a style guide thing on this one?  Eli?
> 
>> > 
>> > 
>> > There are no strict rules on this one, AFAIK.  If the results of
>> > @sc{gdb} look nice to people, let's do it; if not, let's not.
>> > 
>> > Personally, I like the results of @sc in such cases.
> 
>> 
>> So, decision time.  Trunk and 5.3 branch?
> 
> 
> Fine with me.  As long as the manual can be produced in all the
> supported formats without error messages, this change cannot possibly
> screw up the upcoming release 5.3.

Good point.  I've committed it to just the trunk.

Andrew