From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 12996 invoked by alias); 25 Sep 2002 15:49:23 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 12945 invoked from network); 25 Sep 2002 15:49:21 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO touchme.toronto.redhat.com) (216.138.202.10) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 25 Sep 2002 15:49:21 -0000 Received: from redhat.com (totem.toronto.redhat.com [172.16.14.242]) by touchme.toronto.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 900E080022F; Wed, 25 Sep 2002 11:49:20 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <3D91DB00.20005@redhat.com> Date: Wed, 25 Sep 2002 08:49:00 -0000 From: Fernando Nasser Organization: Red Hat , Inc. - Toronto User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.1) Gecko/20020827 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Rob Savoye Cc: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org, gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com, bug-dejagnu@gnu.org Subject: Re: [Bug-dejagnu] Dejagnu and parallel make tests of gcc References: <200209241614.g8OGE2030397@pc960.cambridge.arm.com> <20020924104439.C8038@welcomehome.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SW-Source: 2002-09/txt/msg00612.txt.bz2 Rob Savoye wrote:> On Tue, Sep 24, 2002 at 05:14:02PM +0100, Richard Earnshaw wrote: > > >>Ok, first question. Is the copy of dejagnu on sources.redhat.com (the one >>in gdb) the master copy these days, or is there some other mailing list >>for dejagnu framework patches? > > > The official sources are on Savannah. www.gnu.org/software/dejagnu should > get you there. I do believe sources.redhat.com has recently been synced up > with the master repository at the FSF. But these two repositories are usually > reasonably close to each other. > Yes, except for one baseboard file and configuration they are the same (some blank lines and space differences which I will get rid of after Rob finishes with the dejagnu release). > >> The second patch is to the dejagnu framework itself and ensures that when >>we transfer the object to the (potentially remote) host we use a filename >>that will not conflict with any other -- in this case I've chosen >>${tool}_tg.o, which should be fairly safe. > > > Looks safe to me. I'll check it in after the DejaGnu 1.4.3 release > happens over the next day or so. (I hope) I'm just trying to get my > release files uploaded to the FSF still... then it's done. > It is OK with me as well. Please check it in sources.redhat.com -- Fernando Nasser Red Hat - Toronto E-Mail: fnasser@redhat.com 2323 Yonge Street, Suite #300 Toronto, Ontario M4P 2C9