From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 11260 invoked by alias); 24 Sep 2002 14:44:48 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 11237 invoked from network); 24 Sep 2002 14:44:45 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO touchme.toronto.redhat.com) (216.138.202.10) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 24 Sep 2002 14:44:45 -0000 Received: from redhat.com (tooth.toronto.redhat.com [172.16.14.29]) by touchme.toronto.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 563D6800381; Tue, 24 Sep 2002 10:44:40 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <3D9079FF.1030707@redhat.com> Date: Tue, 24 Sep 2002 07:44:00 -0000 From: Fernando Nasser Organization: Red Hat Canada User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.0.0) Gecko/20020607 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Andrew Cagney Cc: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: [rfa/testsuite] More complaints tests References: <3D8F95D7.9020906@redhat.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SW-Source: 2002-09/txt/msg00578.txt.bz2 Andrew Cagney wrote: > Hello, > > The attached explicitly tests the underlying problem that was causing > weird.exp to fail. > > Briefly, when there wern't any complaint calls, the [broken] code could > generate an unnecessary new line. > > Ok? > Sure. Thanks. -- Fernando Nasser Red Hat Canada Ltd. E-Mail: fnasser@redhat.com 2323 Yonge Street, Suite #300 Toronto, Ontario M4P 2C9