From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 7910 invoked by alias); 20 Sep 2002 16:11:50 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 7902 invoked from network); 20 Sep 2002 16:11:49 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO localhost.redhat.com) (216.138.202.10) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 20 Sep 2002 16:11:49 -0000 Received: from ges.redhat.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by localhost.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 032F93CF9; Fri, 20 Sep 2002 12:11:48 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <3D8B48C3.5020502@ges.redhat.com> Date: Fri, 20 Sep 2002 09:11:00 -0000 From: Andrew Cagney User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; NetBSD macppc; en-US; rv:1.0.0) Gecko/20020824 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Daniel Jacobowitz Cc: David Carlton , gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com, Fernando Nasser Subject: Re: [rfa/testsuite] rename m-static1.cc to m-stat1.cc References: <20020920155144.GA10888@nevyn.them.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SW-Source: 2002-09/txt/msg00526.txt.bz2 > On Fri, Sep 20, 2002 at 08:46:54AM -0700, David Carlton wrote: > >> Andrew just pointed out to me that the presence of both m-static.cc >> and m-static1.cc (in gdb.c++) violates the 8.3 rule. Is it okay if I >> rename m-static1.cc to m-stat1.cc? (And make the corresponding >> obvious change to m-static.exp, of course.) Or is there some other >> name I should use? > > > I'd rather you just add them to the list; it's in > gdb/config/djgpp/fnchange.lst. Others may have a different opinion, > though.. Yes. Per: http://sources.redhat.com/gdb/current/onlinedocs/gdbint_13.html#SEC122 This isn't a file needed to build GDB so fnchange.lst is ok. Andrew