From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 6354 invoked by alias); 19 Sep 2002 15:51:42 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 6346 invoked from network); 19 Sep 2002 15:51:41 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO localhost.redhat.com) (216.138.202.10) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 19 Sep 2002 15:51:41 -0000 Received: from ges.redhat.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by localhost.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3C9263DB8; Thu, 19 Sep 2002 11:51:38 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <3D89F28A.90607@ges.redhat.com> Date: Thu, 19 Sep 2002 08:51:00 -0000 From: Andrew Cagney User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; NetBSD macppc; en-US; rv:1.0.0) Gecko/20020824 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Eli Zaretskii Cc: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: [patch/rfc][rfa:doc][rfa;testsuite] Add ``internal-warning'' References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SW-Source: 2002-09/txt/msg00488.txt.bz2 > On Thu, 12 Sep 2002, Andrew Cagney wrote: > > >> >> I'd like gdb.texinfo to tell more about what GDB will print when this >> >> command is invoked. Perhaps just give an example. ``behave as though >> >> an internal error or warning is being reported'' doesn't sound >> >> descriptive enough (it's not like every user is born with a built-in >> >> knowledge of that behavior... ;-). > >> > >> > >> > Makes sense, I'll do both. > >> >> How is this ... > > > Thanks, please commit this. In. Andrew