From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 29594 invoked by alias); 19 Sep 2002 15:29:08 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 29586 invoked from network); 19 Sep 2002 15:29:05 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO localhost.redhat.com) (216.138.202.10) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 19 Sep 2002 15:29:05 -0000 Received: from ges.redhat.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by localhost.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AEE163DB8; Thu, 19 Sep 2002 11:29:02 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <3D89ED3E.9060106@ges.redhat.com> Date: Thu, 19 Sep 2002 08:29:00 -0000 From: Andrew Cagney User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; NetBSD macppc; en-US; rv:1.0.0) Gecko/20020824 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Eli Zaretskii Cc: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: [rfa:doco] document frame_align() References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SW-Source: 2002-09/txt/msg00487.txt.bz2 > On Wed, 18 Sep 2002, Andrew Cagney wrote: > > >> This documents the frame_align() architecture method. It also clarifies >> the behavior of stack_align(). >> >> ok? > > > Yes. However: > > Unlike @ref{STACK_ALIGN}, this function always adjusts the address > > Please don't use this technique. It sounds cute at first glance, but > produces text in the Info version which looks awkwardly: > > Unlike *note STACK_ALIGN, this function always adjusts the address > > Instead, do it more straightforwardly: > > Unlike @code{STACK_ALIGN} (@pxref{STACK_ALIGN}), ... Ok. > (In this particular case, the @pxref is actually redundant, since you > have a @pxref like that a few lines before that.) Hmm, ok. Gone. Committed with just ``Unlike @code{STACK_ALIGN} ...''. thanks, Andrew