From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 24606 invoked by alias); 18 Sep 2002 17:05:14 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 24597 invoked from network); 18 Sep 2002 17:05:10 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO localhost.redhat.com) (216.138.202.10) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 18 Sep 2002 17:05:10 -0000 Received: from ges.redhat.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by localhost.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D96173CC6; Wed, 18 Sep 2002 13:05:09 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <3D88B245.6030803@ges.redhat.com> Date: Wed, 18 Sep 2002 10:05:00 -0000 From: Andrew Cagney User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; NetBSD macppc; en-US; rv:1.0.0) Gecko/20020824 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Richard.Earnshaw@arm.com Cc: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: [rfa:doco] document frame_align() References: <200209181629.g8IGTKb18884@pc960.cambridge.arm.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SW-Source: 2002-09/txt/msg00404.txt.bz2 > +Unlike @ref{frame_align}, this function always adjusts @var{addr} >> +upwards. > > ^^^^^^^^ > Even for stack_grows_upwards machines? Yes. This is different to frame align. Andrew