Re: [RFA/MI testsuite] gdb/701 test (varobj)

Fernando Nasser
2002-09-18T14:46:35Z

Thanks for checking this out Keith.

Regards,
Fernando

Keith Seitz wrote:
> On Fri, 13 Sep 2002, Fernando Nasser wrote:
>
>
>>As you are at it, canyou take a look at this old patch of mine that I've
>>found lost in a branch.... Something should be broken without it!
>
>
> Ok, I've got a testcase for it... I'll be submitting it shortly.
>
> I think your patch is now obsolete. At one time this was necessary
> because when we call varobj_update, we've already gotten a pointer to our
> varobj (via varobj_get_handle). When varobj_update is called and the type
> changes, the original varobj is deleted, and a new one is created with the
> same name. I changed the API for varobj_update so that this new handle is
> propagated upward.
>
> Thus, when varobj_update returns, the handle is still valid (if
> different). This change was committed by me on 2001-08-17.
>
> Keith
>

--
Fernando Nasser
Red Hat Canada Ltd. E-Mail: fnasser@redhat.com
2323 Yonge Street, Suite #300
Toronto, Ontario M4P 2C9