Mirror of the gdb-patches mailing list
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Andrew Cagney <ac131313@ges.redhat.com>
To: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com
Subject: [patch/mips] Use unwind in mips_get_saved_register
Date: Fri, 13 Sep 2002 10:55:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <3D822687.9080300@ges.redhat.com> (raw)

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 553 bytes --]

Hello,

The attached is ``two steps forward, one step back'' patch.

It modifies mips_get_saved_register() so that it uses the new unwind 
code.  The new unwind code automatically handles the fetching of 
registers in dummy-frames.  Unfortunatly, the change doesn't fix the 
problem of the MIPS fiddling memory register reads dependant on the 
current ABI.

I think, over all it is a step forward though.  It at least helps to 
make it possible to convert the MIPS to generic dummy frames.

-o32 -64 and -n32 all show no regressions.

committed,
Andrew

[-- Attachment #2: diffs --]
[-- Type: text/plain, Size: 2903 bytes --]

Fri Sep 13 07:42:09 2002  Andrew Cagney  <cagney@redhat.com>

	* mips-tdep.c (mips_get_saved_register): Re-hack using
 	frame_register_unwind.

Index: mips-tdep.c
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/src/src/gdb/mips-tdep.c,v
retrieving revision 1.121
diff -u -r1.121 mips-tdep.c
--- mips-tdep.c	10 Sep 2002 21:31:18 -0000	1.121
+++ mips-tdep.c	13 Sep 2002 17:21:13 -0000
@@ -5426,59 +5426,47 @@
 
 static void
 mips_get_saved_register (char *raw_buffer,
-			 int *optimized,
+			 int *optimizedp,
 			 CORE_ADDR *addrp,
 			 struct frame_info *frame,
 			 int regnum,
-			 enum lval_type *lval)
+			 enum lval_type *lvalp)
 {
-  CORE_ADDR addr;
+  CORE_ADDR addrx;
+  enum lval_type lvalx;
+  int optimizedx;
+  int realnum;
 
   if (!target_has_registers)
     error ("No registers.");
 
-  /* Normal systems don't optimize out things with register numbers.  */
-  if (optimized != NULL)
-    *optimized = 0;
-  addr = find_saved_register (frame, regnum);
-  if (addr != 0)
+  /* Make certain that all needed parameters are present.  */
+  if (addrp == NULL)
+    addrp = &addrx;
+  if (lvalp == NULL)
+    lvalp = &lvalx;
+  if (optimizedp == NULL)
+    optimizedp = &optimizedx;
+  frame_register_unwind (get_next_frame (frame), regnum, optimizedp, lvalp,
+			 addrp, &realnum, raw_buffer);
+  /* FIXME: cagney/2002-09-13: This is just so bad.  The MIPS should
+     have a pseudo register range that correspons to the ABI's, rather
+     than the ISA's, view of registers.  These registers would then
+     implicitly describe their size and hence could be used without
+     the below munging.  */
+  if ((*lvalp) == lval_memory)
     {
-      if (lval != NULL)
-	*lval = lval_memory;
-      if (regnum == SP_REGNUM)
-	{
-	  if (raw_buffer != NULL)
-	    {
-	      /* Put it back in target format.  */
-	      store_address (raw_buffer, REGISTER_RAW_SIZE (regnum),
-			     (LONGEST) addr);
-	    }
-	  if (addrp != NULL)
-	    *addrp = 0;
-	  return;
-	}
       if (raw_buffer != NULL)
 	{
-	  LONGEST val;
 	  if (regnum < 32)
-	    /* Only MIPS_SAVED_REGSIZE bytes of GP registers are
-               saved. */
-	    val = read_memory_integer (addr, MIPS_SAVED_REGSIZE);
-	  else
-	    val = read_memory_integer (addr, REGISTER_RAW_SIZE (regnum));
-	  store_address (raw_buffer, REGISTER_RAW_SIZE (regnum), val);
+	    {
+	      /* Only MIPS_SAVED_REGSIZE bytes of GP registers are
+		 saved. */
+	      LONGEST val = read_memory_integer ((*addrp), MIPS_SAVED_REGSIZE);
+	      store_address (raw_buffer, REGISTER_RAW_SIZE (regnum), val);
+	    }
 	}
     }
-  else
-    {
-      if (lval != NULL)
-	*lval = lval_register;
-      addr = REGISTER_BYTE (regnum);
-      if (raw_buffer != NULL)
-	read_register_gen (regnum, raw_buffer);
-    }
-  if (addrp != NULL)
-    *addrp = addr;
 }
 
 /* Immediately after a function call, return the saved pc.

             reply	other threads:[~2002-09-13 17:55 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2002-09-13 10:55 Andrew Cagney [this message]
2002-09-13 11:20 ` Kevin Buettner
2002-09-13 13:00   ` Andrew Cagney

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=3D822687.9080300@ges.redhat.com \
    --to=ac131313@ges.redhat.com \
    --cc=gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox