From: Andrew Cagney <ac131313@ges.redhat.com>
To: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com
Subject: [patch/mips] Use unwind in mips_get_saved_register
Date: Fri, 13 Sep 2002 10:55:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <3D822687.9080300@ges.redhat.com> (raw)
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 553 bytes --]
Hello,
The attached is ``two steps forward, one step back'' patch.
It modifies mips_get_saved_register() so that it uses the new unwind
code. The new unwind code automatically handles the fetching of
registers in dummy-frames. Unfortunatly, the change doesn't fix the
problem of the MIPS fiddling memory register reads dependant on the
current ABI.
I think, over all it is a step forward though. It at least helps to
make it possible to convert the MIPS to generic dummy frames.
-o32 -64 and -n32 all show no regressions.
committed,
Andrew
[-- Attachment #2: diffs --]
[-- Type: text/plain, Size: 2903 bytes --]
Fri Sep 13 07:42:09 2002 Andrew Cagney <cagney@redhat.com>
* mips-tdep.c (mips_get_saved_register): Re-hack using
frame_register_unwind.
Index: mips-tdep.c
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/src/src/gdb/mips-tdep.c,v
retrieving revision 1.121
diff -u -r1.121 mips-tdep.c
--- mips-tdep.c 10 Sep 2002 21:31:18 -0000 1.121
+++ mips-tdep.c 13 Sep 2002 17:21:13 -0000
@@ -5426,59 +5426,47 @@
static void
mips_get_saved_register (char *raw_buffer,
- int *optimized,
+ int *optimizedp,
CORE_ADDR *addrp,
struct frame_info *frame,
int regnum,
- enum lval_type *lval)
+ enum lval_type *lvalp)
{
- CORE_ADDR addr;
+ CORE_ADDR addrx;
+ enum lval_type lvalx;
+ int optimizedx;
+ int realnum;
if (!target_has_registers)
error ("No registers.");
- /* Normal systems don't optimize out things with register numbers. */
- if (optimized != NULL)
- *optimized = 0;
- addr = find_saved_register (frame, regnum);
- if (addr != 0)
+ /* Make certain that all needed parameters are present. */
+ if (addrp == NULL)
+ addrp = &addrx;
+ if (lvalp == NULL)
+ lvalp = &lvalx;
+ if (optimizedp == NULL)
+ optimizedp = &optimizedx;
+ frame_register_unwind (get_next_frame (frame), regnum, optimizedp, lvalp,
+ addrp, &realnum, raw_buffer);
+ /* FIXME: cagney/2002-09-13: This is just so bad. The MIPS should
+ have a pseudo register range that correspons to the ABI's, rather
+ than the ISA's, view of registers. These registers would then
+ implicitly describe their size and hence could be used without
+ the below munging. */
+ if ((*lvalp) == lval_memory)
{
- if (lval != NULL)
- *lval = lval_memory;
- if (regnum == SP_REGNUM)
- {
- if (raw_buffer != NULL)
- {
- /* Put it back in target format. */
- store_address (raw_buffer, REGISTER_RAW_SIZE (regnum),
- (LONGEST) addr);
- }
- if (addrp != NULL)
- *addrp = 0;
- return;
- }
if (raw_buffer != NULL)
{
- LONGEST val;
if (regnum < 32)
- /* Only MIPS_SAVED_REGSIZE bytes of GP registers are
- saved. */
- val = read_memory_integer (addr, MIPS_SAVED_REGSIZE);
- else
- val = read_memory_integer (addr, REGISTER_RAW_SIZE (regnum));
- store_address (raw_buffer, REGISTER_RAW_SIZE (regnum), val);
+ {
+ /* Only MIPS_SAVED_REGSIZE bytes of GP registers are
+ saved. */
+ LONGEST val = read_memory_integer ((*addrp), MIPS_SAVED_REGSIZE);
+ store_address (raw_buffer, REGISTER_RAW_SIZE (regnum), val);
+ }
}
}
- else
- {
- if (lval != NULL)
- *lval = lval_register;
- addr = REGISTER_BYTE (regnum);
- if (raw_buffer != NULL)
- read_register_gen (regnum, raw_buffer);
- }
- if (addrp != NULL)
- *addrp = addr;
}
/* Immediately after a function call, return the saved pc.
next reply other threads:[~2002-09-13 17:55 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2002-09-13 10:55 Andrew Cagney [this message]
2002-09-13 11:20 ` Kevin Buettner
2002-09-13 13:00 ` Andrew Cagney
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=3D822687.9080300@ges.redhat.com \
--to=ac131313@ges.redhat.com \
--cc=gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox