From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 1810 invoked by alias); 9 Sep 2002 19:42:28 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 1803 invoked from network); 9 Sep 2002 19:42:27 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO localhost.redhat.com) (216.138.202.10) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 9 Sep 2002 19:42:27 -0000 Received: from ges.redhat.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by localhost.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5333D3F44; Mon, 9 Sep 2002 15:42:26 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <3D7CF9A2.9040506@ges.redhat.com> Date: Mon, 09 Sep 2002 12:42:00 -0000 From: Andrew Cagney User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; NetBSD macppc; en-US; rv:1.0.0) Gecko/20020824 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Ben Elliston Cc: Fernando Nasser , gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: [RFA] testsuite cleanups References: <15739.31585.40750.573090@tooth.toronto.redhat.com> <3D7CDA8A.9080508@ges.redhat.com> <15740.63375.453654.24236@tooth.toronto.redhat.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SW-Source: 2002-09/txt/msg00128.txt.bz2 >>>>>> "Andrew" == Andrew Cagney writes: > > > Andrew> For GDB, I think the entire comment can simply be removed. > Andrew> Ever since 5.0, the files have been bundled in with GDB so I > Andrew> don't think the comment even applies. > > That sounds sensible -- I agree. Shall I submit a new patch which > just removes those comments? Looks obvious to me :-) Andrew